Witryna26 maj 2024 · At least in Texas, the disciplinary rules instruct that “ [w]here a client wishes to have...suspect evidence introduced, generally the lawyer should do so and allow the finder of fact to assess its probative value.” See Tex. R. … WitrynaBut the impeaching attorney still is not permitted to introduce extrinsic evidence of the witness’s prior inconsistent statement or bias unless the witness has first been examined about the statement or bias and has failed to unequivocally admit it. All other changes to the rule are intended to be stylistic only. About the Author
Rule 609: Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal …
Witrynaaccused all exculpatory evidence in their possession. Subsequent Supreme Court decisions have elaborated the Brady obligations to include the duty to disclose (1) impeachment evidence,2 (2) favorable evidence in the absence of a request by the accused,3 and (3) evidence in the possession of persons or organizations (e.g., WitrynaEvidence depicting invasive visual recording of a child, as governed by Article 39.151 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. c. Duty to disclose exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating evidence: Under Article 39.14(h), prosecutors shall disclose to the defendant any exculpatory, impeachment, or mitigating document, item, or how do they test for down syndrome
Bar complaint dropped against Kentucky attorney accused of …
Witryna15 kwi 2024 · Because impeachment evidence pertains to a witness’ testimony, the general rule is that a prior felony of a corporation cannot be used to impeach a corporate employee’s testimony unless the employee participated in the criminal conduct. See e.g., Walden v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 126 F. 3d 506, 523 – 524 (3rd Cir. 1997); see also … Witryna12 kwi 2024 · This week, U.S. District Judge Barbara Lynn criticized the federal prosecutors in the John Wiley Price trial for “improper conduct” in the withholding of evidence from the defense team, going so far as to say this may endanger the “fundamental fairness” of the trial. WitrynaAlthough the *880 Texas rule deviates from its federal counterpart in some material ways,[5] it is the same with respect to its requirement that, as a prerequisite to admitting impeachment evidence against an accused, the trial court must find[6] that the probative value of such evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect. how much sliced ham for 20 people